If one of our readers had taken a long holiday during the first half of 2025, checking on their portfolio only at the beginning and end of the period, they could be forgiven for thinking that not much had happened. Portfolio values would have generally increased as both stock and bond markets made good progress, and the overall tone of events at the end of this period would have been noticeably more upbeat than the end of the previous one. What had happened in between – a stomach churning equity market fall, followed by a huge rally, which all played out against the noisiest of geopolitical backdrops – would have been hard to fathom, almost as if it had all been a bad dream.
This sense of the unreal continued throughout June, which ended up as a positive month overall, despite the intrusion of a war in the Middle East and a corresponding spike in the price of oil. The market’s resilience was mainly driven by the positive sentiment surrounding the extension of grace periods before full implementation of President Trump’s new tariff regime. These extensions had led investors to believe that, under pressure from markets, the new US administration would swiftly back away from its more damaging policy initiatives. This narrative, and the positive shift in sentiment it brought with it, was enough to generate sufficient momentum for markets to sail serenely through what otherwise might have been a difficult period, although it would also be fair to say that investors had never really believed the Israeli–Iranian conflict would escalate too far, given the weak hand the Iranian government had to play.
June was also a time, in our opinion, when the key longer term market issues became a little easier to identify and manage. These issues include ongoing pressure in government bond markets, a rotation away from US dollar denominated assets into ‘Rest of World’ assets and the tantalising prospect of large scale, AI inspired technological change. These factors are just the more obvious trends. There are many others, and together they form an outlook which, in our opinion, is as rich with opportunities as it is with threats.
This view is reflected in your investment portfolios, which we would generally characterise as still adopting a ‘glass half full stance’ in terms of their positioning. We think that, in the end, greater government spending and lower interest rates combine to take the edge off the elevated levels of economic uncertainty, helping markets to continue their current muddled progress forward. This is a finely judged call, and we are consequently very choosy about where we take the specific investment risks.
For example, during the first half of this year we continued to rebalance equity positions geographically, with a slight tilt towards the Rest of World compared to the USA, reflecting the better value on offer outside of the US. This process has accelerated year to date, as President Trump’s ‘America First’ agenda has had the effect of diverting marginal investment flows away from US dollar denominated assets and into almost everything else. We think that we would rather be moving with this trend than against it, especially as there are plenty of reasonable non US ideas to invest in.
Similarly, we think that the inexorable pressure on government balance sheets is pushing bond yields up across the globe, making us wary of having any sensitivity to this phenomenon. Where mandates allow, we have also steadily increased exposure to alternative assets, an arena where there are plenty of strategies which ‘enjoy’ market volatility or simply act as insurance against unexpected events. The combination of these actions leaves portfolios with a very broad diversification of risks, something we think can allow us to make returns whilst remaining resilient to unexpected, adverse events.
Although the implications of the global trading, security and funding environments unmooring from long held foundations are unnerving, we would also note that markets have shown an extraordinary resilience to all these factors and the tense geopolitical environment. That would suggest to us that there are enough positives floating around at the moment to underpin our modest ‘risk on’ mindset, even though we also expect the flip flopping in market sentiment to continue into the rest of the year.
Article sources
Editorial policy
All authors have considerable industry expertise and specific knowledge on any given topic. All pieces are reviewed by an additional qualified financial specialist to ensure objectivity and accuracy to the best of our ability. All reviewer’s qualifications are from leading industry bodies. Where possible we use primary sources to support our work. These can include white papers, government sources and data, original reports and interviews or articles from other industry experts. We also reference research from other reputable financial planning and investment management firms where appropriate.